| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Posted by marieandreeweiss on August 22, 2011 · 1 Comment
Le rapport de l’Assemblée Nationale s’intéresse également à l’informatique dans les nuages, le ‘cloud computing’, qui présente de nombreux avantages économiques pour les entreprises, et même pour les gouvernements, mais dont l’utilisation n’est pas sans risques pour la sécurité des données personnelles. (3e partie de notre série)
Filed under Europe, European Union, Français, France, Marie-Andrée Weiss, Outlines, Reports & Surveys · Tagged with Agence Danoise de protection des données, Assemblée nationale française, Centres de données, cloud computing, CNIL, Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, confidentialité des données, Congrès américain, Conseil Supérieur de la Propriété Littéraire et Artistique, CSPLA, data centers, externalisation, FCC, Federal Communications Commission, Google, IaaS, Informatique en Nuage, Infrastructure as a Service, Julius Genachowski, PaaS, Platform as a Service, SaaS, Software as a Service, sous-traitance, sous-traitant, Union européenne, vie privée
© Copyright 2010-2014 "Information Security Breaches & The Law".
All rights reserved, unless noted otherwise under each author's post, page or other material.
If you would like to discuss licensing terms, contact us at: info [at] security-breaches [dot] com.
Information Security Breaches & The Law · Privacy, data protection and information security issues and challenges
Are ‘clouds’ located outside the European Union unlawful?
Posted by "Security Breaches" Administrator on July 16, 2010 · 3 Comments
A central aspect of every cloud service contract is the security of data processing. It is therefore important, if only for liability reasons, that responsibility for specific security measures be clearly assigned. This can be done by using security service level agreements between the cloud service provider and its client that clearly assign who is responsible for which particular security measure.
Storing data in a cloud located outside the EU raises specific legal compliance issues. According to some experts, such clouds are even unlawful. There are, however, some ways to make sure that, even if a data controller stores data into a cloud located in a third country, he is still in compliance with German data protection law. A data exporter must use, in order to satisfy the adequate level of data protection requirement, specific standard contractual clauses for all contracts with a cloud service company located outside the EU. Binding corporate rules are the alternative solution, though only for private clouds.
Rate this:
Filed under Cédric Laurant, Comments, English, EU Law, Europe, European Union, Germany, Marie-Andrée Weiss, Outlines · Tagged with adequate level of data protection, anonymization, Argentina, Article 26 (EU DP Dir.), Article 29 Working Party, BDSG, Binding corporate rules, Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, cloud computing, cloud service contract, cloud service provider, confidentiality, data controller, data processing security, Data Protection Authority, data protection law, data security, data security breaches, Datenschutzzentrum, Düsseldorfer Kreis, Dr. Thilo Weichert, encryption, EU Directive 95/46/EC, European Commission, European Privacy Seal, EuroPriSe, external audit, German Federal Data Protection Act, Germany, Google, IaaS, integrity, liability, PaaS, personal data, private cloud, pseudonym, public cloud, SaaS, Safe Harbor Framework, Safe Harbor self-certification, SAS 70, Security Service Level Agreement, standard contractual clauses, State of Schleswig-Holstein, Switzerland, third country, third party, United States, Yahoo