“Is Your Company under Threat? New Digital Risks & Computer Attacks: Forensic & Data Protection Aspects” (Conference in Medellin, Colombia, Nov. 16, 2011)

Conference: "Is Your Company at Risk? New Digital Risks and Computer Attacks: Forensic and Data Protection Aspects - International Perspectives and the New Colombian Legislation" (EAFIT, Medellin, Colombia - 16 Nov. 2011)

“Is Your Company at Risk? New Digital Risks and Computer Attacks: Forensic and Data Protection Aspects – International Perspectives and the New Colombian Legislation.” A conference (in Spanish) about the recent Colombian data protection law, on Nov. 16, 2011 at the Universidad EAFIT in Medellin, Colombia.

Rate this:

Advertisements

New Brazilian Data Protection Bill Adopts Data Breach Notification Regime

"Metrô-Linha Vermelha" (Photo by "mlsirac"; shot on Sept. 11, 2010 in Sao Paulo, Brazil). Available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/mlsirac/4988830112/ (Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)" license.)

The new Brazilian Data Protection bill currently in discussion provides a whole new approach to data protection for the country. It also follows the current trend of several countries, the European Union included, by adopting a data breach notification regime. The text would make companies liable without the need to prove omission or negligence. Currently they are only liable to the extent of damages resulting from the misuse of information leaked or stolen due to a data security breach.

Rate this:

ENISA Surveys Stakeholders of Upcoming EU Data Breach Notification Regime

"Grillage gelé" (Photo by "Photophilius"; shot on Dec. 13, 2008). Available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/30254220@N04/3116313871/ (Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)" license.)

The European Network and Information Security Agency has recently published a report on data breach notifications in the European Union. ENISA surveyed data protection authorities, telecommunications regulatory authorities and telecom operators from different countries in the EU, but also from other non-EU countries such as the United States.
Using the various stakeholders’ responses, the report helps understand the practices and challenges of the future mandatory data breach notification regime, and aims to assist public authorities and private organizations in the EU as they implement data breach notification policies by providing a set of recommendations.
(Résumé aussi disponible en français)

Rate this:

European Data Protection Supervisor Supports General Obligation to Report Security Breaches

"Sunlight" (Photo by Luc De Leeuw; shot on Feb. 3, 2008). Available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/9619972@N08/2422737815/ (Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)" license.)

The European Data Protection Supervisor has recently issued an opinion on the review of the EU legal framework for data protection (Directive 95/46/EC). It expresses concerns regarding the increasing difficulties for individuals to protect the privacy of their personal data, and calls for strengthening individuals’ rights over them. This can be done, the EDPS argues, by making security breach notifications mandatory for all relevant sectors, increasing transparency of processing for data subjects, and introducing new rights, such as the “right to be forgotten” and the “right to data portability”.

Rate this:

Will France adopt a law requiring the notification of security breaches?

A French bill “to better guarantee the right to privacy in the digital age” has implemented the European Directive 2009/136/EC by requiring the data controller to inform the “Data Protection Correspondent” (a person within an organization who could be the controller or someone assisting the controller), or in the absence thereof, the French data protection authority (the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés), of a breach of integrity or confidentiality. Those involved in the breach must also be informed, at least if security breaches are “likely to adversely affect” their personal data. The bill follows the recommendation of the Directive to notify individuals of security breaches for all sectors, not just electronic communications. It was adopted by the French Senate on March 24, 2010 and is currently before the National Assembly.
(A French version of this article is also available in this blog.)

Rate this:

Article 29 Data Protection Working Party reports on implementation of Data Retention Directive

The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party has adopted on July 13, 2010 a report on the EU Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC). This report is the Working Party’s contribution to the evaluation of the implementation of the Data Retention Directive by the European Commission, which is due by September 15, 2010. The report details the results of a joint inquiry made by the data protection authorities about the compliance, at the national level, with the obligations of telecom providers and Internet service providers with both the Data Retention Directive and articles 6 and 9 of the EU e-Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC).

Rate this:

Are ‘clouds’ located outside the European Union unlawful?

A central aspect of every cloud service contract is the security of data processing. It is therefore important, if only for liability reasons, that responsibility for specific security measures be clearly assigned. This can be done by using security service level agreements between the cloud service provider and its client that clearly assign who is responsible for which particular security measure.
Storing data in a cloud located outside the EU raises specific legal compliance issues. According to some experts, such clouds are even unlawful. There are, however, some ways to make sure that, even if a data controller stores data into a cloud located in a third country, he is still in compliance with German data protection law. A data exporter must use, in order to satisfy the adequate level of data protection requirement, specific standard contractual clauses for all contracts with a cloud service company located outside the EU. Binding corporate rules are the alternative solution, though only for private clouds.

Rate this:

The Safe Harbor Framework: not a “safe harbor” anymore for US companies? German expert body insists on stronger compliance stance

On April 29, 2010, the Düsseldorfer Kreis, an informal group of German data protection authorities, published a decision that could have significant repercussions on U.S. companies importing personal data from organizations operating in the European Union. One of these repercussions is that German organizations exporting personal data to the United States should check if the U.S. data importer does indeed comply with the Safe Harbor Framework. Security plan recommendations will provide for a useful guideline to E.U. data exporters to help them comply with the Safe Harbor’s Security Principle.

Rate this:

Canada May Soon Have a Data Breach Law

Canadian Industry Minister Tony Clement introduced a bill on May 25, the Safeguarding Canadian’s Personal Information Act (C-29), which would amend Canada’s national privacy legislation, the Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act of 1998 (“PIPEDA”). C-29 would introduce a security breach disclosure (also called “notification” in the United States) requirement in PIPEDA. Canada does not yet have such a law, contrary to the United States where the majority of states have enacted data breach notification statutes.

Rate this:

  • Blog authors

  • Copyright notice

    © Copyright 2010-2014 "Information Security Breaches & The Law".
    All rights reserved, unless noted otherwise under each author's post, page or other material.
    If you would like to discuss licensing terms, contact us at: info [at] security-breaches [dot] com.

  • Enter your e-mail address here to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by e-mail.

  • The “Global Information Security Breach Professionals” Group on Linkedin

  • Wordpress Blog Stats

    • 46,119 hits